![da vinci code real da vinci code real](https://news.artnet.com/app/news-upload/2016/04/Leonardo_da_Vinci_-_presumed_self-portrait_-_WGA127981-256x256.jpg)
That sounds fine-unless you actually read the so-called “gnostic gospels” and compare them to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The novel claims that the gnostic Jesus is far more human than the divinized Jesus of the four canonical Gospels contained in the Christian Bible. in an impenetrable cloak of divinity, and using it to expand their own power”. One of the more laughable claims of Brown’s novel is that the early Christians “literally” stole Jesus and shrouded his “human message. The Council of Nicaea did not define that Jesus, the Son of God, was divine (since that was accepted by all Christians) but addressed the issue of the exact relationship between the Son and the Father: Are they equal? One in substance? Two Persons? The Council specifically addressed and condemned the popular heresy of that time, called Arianism, which insisted that the Son was a lesser god, created by the Father at some point in time and not eternally existent. The most primitive confession had been ‘Jesus is Lord’, and its import had been elaborated and deepened in the apostolic age.” Kelly writes that “the all but universal Christian conviction in the had been that Jesus Christ was divine as well as human. In his seminal study, Early Christian Doctrines, noted scholar J.N.D. There is plenty of evidence that the early Christians, dating back to Jesus’ time on earth, believed that Jesus of Nazareth was divine. The fact that this has caused hardly a ripple among fans of the novel indicates a revealing (and hardly surprising) lack of knowledge about early Church history and belief. 325, and that prior to that time, no one-not even Jesus’ followers-believed Jesus was anything more than a “mortal prophet” and great man.
![da vinci code real da vinci code real](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNDU1MDQ2MDI5M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDc0NzIzMQ@@._V1_.jpg)
But an even more audacious claim of the novel is that the divinity of Jesus was first raised and established at the Council of Nicaea in A.D. Much attention has been given to The Da Vinci Code’s claim that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. Here is a brief look at just a few of the claims made in Brown’s novel and on his web site. The Da Vinci Hoax: Exposing the Errors in The Da Vinci Code examines, in much detail, the lengthy list of claims made in the Code. A frequent question asked by readers of Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code is “How much of the novel’s depiction of historical events, people, artwork, and institutions is correct.” The short answer is “Not much.” In fact, the only thing more amazing than Brown’s consistent misrepresentation of facts is a widespread acceptance of his claims, with both reviewers and readers praising the “research” and “knowledge” supposedly evident in his novel.